L'avenir du journalisme - encore et toujours

Dans le Washington Post,

Call me a grumpy old codger, but I liked the old way better. For one thing, I used to have at least a rudimentary idea of how a newspaper got produced: On deadline, drunks with cigars wrote stories that were edited by constipated but knowledgeable people, then printed on paper by enormous machines operated by people with stupid hats and dirty faces.

Everything is different today, and it's much more confusing. For one thing, there are no real deadlines anymore, because stories are constantly being updated for the Web. All stories are due now, and most of the constipated people are gone, replaced by multiplatform idea triage specialists. In this hectic environment, mistakes are more likely to be made, meaning that a story might identify Uzbekistan as "a subspecies of goat."

Le NY Times devient partiellement payant, à la WSJ.

L'avenir passe par Flipboard ?

Point de vue pertinent de Nicolas Langelier. À quand une nouvelle publication ?

Et un autre en extra sur l'avenir de la musique, aka Pandora.